Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://repo.lib.jfn.ac.lk/ujrr/handle/123456789/3603
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAlvaappillai, P.
dc.contributor.authorPrabhaharan, M.
dc.contributor.authorMikunthan, T.
dc.date.accessioned2021-07-15T05:53:29Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-07-07T07:14:54Z-
dc.date.available2021-07-15T05:53:29Z
dc.date.available2022-07-07T07:14:54Z-
dc.date.issued2012
dc.identifier.issn2279-1922
dc.identifier.urihttp://repo.lib.jfn.ac.lk/ujrr/handle/123456789/3603-
dc.description.abstractTwo systems of multimillion financially supported reconstruction projects were practiced in Vadamaradchi North to improve the condition of affected people those who have been facing continuous grievances for a long period nearly three decades of improper ground situation the years indicating 1980-1981, 1986-1987, 1992-1993, 1996-1997, 2004-2005 and 2008- 2009. The two systems were evaluated after five years of completion of house reconstruction with settlement that is the “Core House Concept” (CHC) known as House Owners Reconstruction System (HORS) supporting direct financial system and Finished House Reconstruction System (FHRS) supporting indirect financial and material transaction including land allotment, a cluster housing project. The above two systems were evaluated after construction of houses, the HORS done by NEHRP under world bank and FHRS done by NGO known as HUDEC CARITAS. Evaluation was carried out on the basis of 12 levels of house reconstruction performance chart (HRPC), three economical aspects, two social aspects and two financial aspects in the coastal area of Vadamaradchi, Alvai North -West the most affected coastal village was selected for the impact assessment. Visited house by house for this study and selected 121 houses built under World Bank (NEHRP-HORS) and 45 houses built under the FHRS, LNGO/CARITAS. An initial study was conducted for the last five months that revealed the FHRS indicated several benefits without any financial or material flow impediments but HORS indicated large number of unidentified financial transaction, material usages, confusion in selection of beneficiaries, contradiction among vulnerable people in finding location, improper time consuming activities, abundant houses, looted houses, less quality building materials, unidentified beneficiaries, false statement in handling money in field, cheating money transaction, deduction in money handling and facilitated losses in funding installment. It is obviously identified FHRS is more effective system and the other world bank HORS is utterly failed particularly in this area, even though affected people got their houses and satisfied, an acceptable result.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of Jaffnaen_US
dc.subjectBeneficiariesen_US
dc.subjectReconstructionen_US
dc.subjectNEHRPen_US
dc.subjectCARITASen_US
dc.titleImpact assessment on house reconstruction of two funding systemsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:JUICE 2012

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Impact Assessment on House Reconstruction of.pdf231.25 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.