Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://repo.lib.jfn.ac.lk/ujrr/handle/123456789/5428
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorTharsika, K.
dc.contributor.authorPratheepkanth, P.
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-02T04:25:50Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-28T03:42:20Z-
dc.date.available2022-03-02T04:25:50Z
dc.date.available2022-06-28T03:42:20Z-
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.urihttp://repo.lib.jfn.ac.lk/ujrr/handle/123456789/5428-
dc.description.abstractThis paper focuses on removing the ambiguity regarding selecting the research methodology when embarking on a research project by the researcher in the social science phenomenon. Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods are the dominant methodologies in the social research milieu. Choosing an appropriate methodology is determined by the research paradigms (positivism, interpretive, transformative, and pragmatism). These paradigms are differentiated by the philosophical assumptions (ontology, epistemology, and research method). Therefore, the researcher should be aware of their philosophical assumptions because they inevitably shape the whole research project.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherFaculty of Business Studies, Vavuniya Campus of the University of Jaffna, Sri Lankaen_US
dc.subjectPositivismen_US
dc.subjectInterpretiveen_US
dc.subjectInterpretiveen_US
dc.subjectTransformativeen_US
dc.subjectPragmatismen_US
dc.titleA review of methodological choice: Research paradigm underpinsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Accounting

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
A review of methodological choice Research paradigm underpins.pdf204.43 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.