Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://repo.lib.jfn.ac.lk/ujrr/handle/123456789/6281
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorJanen, T.-
dc.contributor.authorMurugathas, K.-
dc.contributor.authorKupeshan, R.-
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-23T06:15:31Z-
dc.date.available2022-09-23T06:15:31Z-
dc.date.issued2022-
dc.identifier.isbn9786246150075-
dc.identifier.urihttp://repo.lib.jfn.ac.lk/ujrr/handle/123456789/6281-
dc.description.abstractOpen Access (OA) is a model for publishing scholarly peer-reviewed journals, and articles can be freely read, as the publishing is funded through the Article Pro cessing Charges (APC) other than subscription. The development of open access publishing created a pathway for predatory publishing, which is an exploitive profit-making academic business, charging publication fees from authors without providing quality editorial service. The issue becomes a serious problem for the researchers to differentiate a legitimate publication from a predatory publication. This article aims to measure the awareness of predatory open-access journals among academics. The population of the study was permanent academic staff members attached to the Faculty of Management and Business Studies, University of Jaffna. There was a total of 52 academic staff members, so there was no sampling; all staff members were included in the study. A pretested online questionnaire was circulated among academics from the Faculty of Management and Business Studies, Univer sity of Jaffna. Among the total(n=52) population, 67.3% of the staff responded to the questionnaire. The results of this study revealed that 22.85% of the staff were fully knowledgeable about the open-access system, 40% knowledgeable, 25.71% somewhat knowledgeable, and 11.42% slightly knowledgeable. Faculty members prioritized the listed factors considered during the journal selection, such as duration of the publication process, impact factor, the peer review process, quality of the editorial board, publication costs, editorial support, and journal indexing. Weight score calculated based on the preference level and Journal indexing (209) was highly prioritized by the respondents, followed by the impact factor (179), publication cost (177), and peer review process (168) in journal selection. Nearly 70% of the study participants know about predatory publishing, and 28.5% of the respondents may have heard about it, but they were not sure about predatory publications. Among the respondents, all were aware of at least any systems to differentiate the predatory journal from the legitimate journal. The study suggests that there is a need to conduct more awareness programs to educate the predatory open-access publications to the academic staff members of the Faculty of Management and Business Studies of the University of Jaffna.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of Jaffnaen_US
dc.subjectOpen access publishingen_US
dc.subjectPredatory publishingen_US
dc.subjectJournal selectionen_US
dc.subjectLegitimate journalen_US
dc.titleAwareness of predatory open access journals among academics of the Faculty of Management and Business Studies at the University of Jaffnaen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:ETAKAM 2022



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.