Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://repo.lib.jfn.ac.lk/ujrr/handle/123456789/9920
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSarvananthan, M.-
dc.date.accessioned2023-12-08T03:39:02Z-
dc.date.available2023-12-08T03:39:02Z-
dc.date.issued2023-
dc.identifier.urihttp://repo.lib.jfn.ac.lk/ujrr/handle/123456789/9920-
dc.description.abstractThis is a response to the Briefing Paper entitled Evolution of Chinese Lending to Sri Lanka since the mid-2000s – Separating Myth from Reality, written by Umesh Moramudali and Thilina Panduwawala published by the China-Africa Research Initiative of the School of Advanced International Studies (SAIS) at the John Hopkins University, USA. This response identifies a few factual errors (both quantitative and qualitative) and provides alternative data, and contests the interpretations of the data and conclusion drawn therefrom by Moramudali and Panduwawala by providing concrete examples to the contrary. We characterise Chinese lending to Sri Lanka between 2007 and 2022 as quasi-predatory lending, having defined the characteristics of predatory lending.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSocial Science Research Networken_US
dc.subjectChinaen_US
dc.subjectHambantota Porten_US
dc.subjectPredatory Lendingen_US
dc.subjectSovereign Defaulten_US
dc.subjectSri Lankaen_US
dc.titleChinese Lending to Sri Lanka: A Factual cum “Reality” Check A Rejoinder to Umesh Moramudali and Thilina Panduwawalaen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4369990-
Appears in Collections:Economics



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.